Gamba Osaka vs Hiroshima. Prediction for the match of the championship of Japan

Prediction and bet on Gamba Osaka vs Hiroshima, statistics, odds. Gamba Osaka recently lost to Hiroshima, how will the match end on June 29?

Our Expert Predictions & Analysis on Gamba Osaka vs Hiroshima

Gamba Osaka

Gamba Osaka are performing terribly in the current season and are currently in the relegation zone, having a series of four defeats in a row. To be fair, in their home field the team is quite aggressive in attack and has already scored 11 goals in eight rounds.

The club was defeated a few days ago by Sapporo with a minimum score of 0:1.


Hiroshima had a fairly good first round and settled in the top four, seven points behind the leader. On the road, the team has only one defeat in the current championship, but the abundance of draw results spoil the statistics, and it concedes more goals per match here.

The club in the previous round beat Fukuoka with a comfortable score of 3:1.

Gamba Osaka vs Hiroshima

Gamba Osaka vs Hiroshima facts

  • Correct score 1:3 - Hiroshima won two out of eight matches 3-1;
  • Hiroshima will miss - Gamba score at home in five games;

Game Totals Prediction

In our opinion, it is better to bet in this confrontation in favor of the visiting team. He looks much more interesting in the current championship, being in the group of leaders. The hosts are completely unstuck and suffer one setback after another, so we give preference to their opponents.

Guests have been consistently winning lately.

Our prediction is the victory of Hiroshima in BC 1xbet for 1.67. Download 1xbet to your phone and place a bet on the favorite!

In our opinion, preference in this pair should be given to a high total. We do not think that rivals from different poles of the table will close on the defensive. The hosts have a number of great players and began to score regularly. Guests are also consistently different and win.

We take total balls over 2.5 for 1.84.

Add comment

Leave comment for feedback

reload, if the code cannot be seen

Comments 0